The Web Design Group

... Making the Web accessible to all.

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Strange block (Google)
pandy
post Apr 18 2023, 09:47 AM
Post #1


🌟Computer says no🌟
********

Group: WDG Moderators
Posts: 20,733
Joined: 9-August 06
Member No.: 6



For about 15 minutes I was met by this when I tried to use Google with FF - and only FF.

Attached Image

I decided I myself must have blocked google accidentaly and was going to ask how to find those settings since I couldn't, but then it resolved.

What happened here? Who blocked whom and why?
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
coothead
post Apr 18 2023, 10:43 AM
Post #2


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 206
Joined: 12-January 23
From: chertsey, a small town 25 miles south west of london, england
Member No.: 28,743



QUOTE(pandy @ Apr 18 2023, 03:47 PM) *

. What happened here?



You probably just had A goblin in the works experience. IPB Image

The little buggers come out to play when one least expects them.IPB Image


coothead
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
Christian J
post Apr 18 2023, 11:57 AM
Post #3


.
********

Group: WDG Moderators
Posts: 9,661
Joined: 10-August 06
Member No.: 7



ISTR that message is generated when the browser refuses to load what it thinks is a Cross-origin violation. Didn't something similar happen when trying to run Ajax (or some other JS) in HTML files on your local file system?

User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
pandy
post Apr 18 2023, 04:05 PM
Post #4


🌟Computer says no🌟
********

Group: WDG Moderators
Posts: 20,733
Joined: 9-August 06
Member No.: 6



Nope. Wasn't me. Never done anything with Ajax as I can recall.

Anyway, it happened again and now it lasted longer. Don't know how long because I went out and it's OK again now, but longer than the first time.
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
Christian J
post Apr 18 2023, 05:09 PM
Post #5


.
********

Group: WDG Moderators
Posts: 9,661
Joined: 10-August 06
Member No.: 7



QUOTE(pandy @ Apr 18 2023, 11:05 PM) *

Nope. Wasn't me. Never done anything with Ajax as I can recall.

Not you, I just recalled seeing the same message long time ago.

QUOTE
Anyway, it happened again and now it lasted longer. Don't know how long because I went out and it's OK again now, but longer than the first time.

Any browser extension that might be interfering? unsure.gif
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
coothead
post Apr 18 2023, 05:52 PM
Post #6


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 206
Joined: 12-January 23
From: chertsey, a small town 25 miles south west of london, england
Member No.: 28,743




Those who ignore gremlins, do so at their own peril. IPB Image


coothead
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
pandy
post Apr 18 2023, 07:49 PM
Post #7


🌟Computer says no🌟
********

Group: WDG Moderators
Posts: 20,733
Joined: 9-August 06
Member No.: 6



QUOTE(Christian J @ Apr 19 2023, 12:09 AM) *

Any browser extension that might be interfering? unsure.gif


Hmm. I didn't use to have any but recently installed a few EXIF readers to try them out. Strange that it only happens with google though, whatever the reason is.
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
Christian J
post Apr 19 2023, 09:10 AM
Post #8


.
********

Group: WDG Moderators
Posts: 9,661
Joined: 10-August 06
Member No.: 7



The error message

QUOTE
Blocked Page

An error occurred during a connection to ...

seems to occur in various situations, many seem to indicate Cross-origin issues:

https://dausruddin.com/adsense-blocked-page...oubleclick-net/
https://github.com/xwiki-labs/cryptpad/issues/785
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6497819...-policy-require
https://support.google.com/calendar/thread/...says-block-page
https://itch.io/t/2713665/downloads-dont-wo...support-enabled
https://forum.joomla.org/viewtopic.php?t=997169 (a bit down the thread)

Maybe google.com and/or some extension is using iframes or Ajax in a way Firefox disapproves of. unsure.gif

It could also be some hardware issue with your PC, have you tried rebooting when it happens? tongue.gif
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
pandy
post Apr 19 2023, 10:22 AM
Post #9


🌟Computer says no🌟
********

Group: WDG Moderators
Posts: 20,733
Joined: 9-August 06
Member No.: 6



OK. Doesn't look like anything I can control.

QUOTE

It could also be some hardware issue with your PC, have you tried rebooting when it happens? tongue.gif


No. Why? It's only FF and one single site. Strange though, when it happens it affects both searching from the address bar and going to google.com. So whatever it is must be on all google's search pages.
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
Christian J
post Apr 20 2023, 09:47 AM
Post #10


.
********

Group: WDG Moderators
Posts: 9,661
Joined: 10-August 06
Member No.: 7



QUOTE(Christian J @ Apr 18 2023, 06:57 PM) *

ISTR that message is generated when the browser refuses to load what it thinks is a Cross-origin violation.

At least it doesn't seem to be about frames. Tried this in Firefox:

CODE
<iframe src="https://google.com/"></iframe>

and got this different error message:

"Firefox Can’t Open This Page

To protect your security, www.google.com will not allow Firefox to display the page if another site has embedded it. To see this page, you need to open it in a new window.

Learn more…

Report errors like this to help Mozilla identify and block malicious sites"


Now that I think of it, I also recall other cases (Ajax or JS in local files) were only reported in the Inspector, not the usual browser window. unsure.gif
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
pandy
post Apr 20 2023, 04:09 PM
Post #11


🌟Computer says no🌟
********

Group: WDG Moderators
Posts: 20,733
Joined: 9-August 06
Member No.: 6



Did you use the iframe in a local page? Jeez, I'm feeling overprotected.
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
Christian J
post Apr 20 2023, 07:08 PM
Post #12


.
********

Group: WDG Moderators
Posts: 9,661
Joined: 10-August 06
Member No.: 7



QUOTE(pandy @ Apr 20 2023, 11:09 PM) *

Did you use the iframe in a local page?

No, online, but I don't think browsers can tell the difference between local and online in these cases.

Maybe using my own website was a stupid idea, considering the error message says: "Report errors like this to help Mozilla identify and block malicious sites" --I hope nothing get reported automatically, then I may have blacklisted my own domain. happy.gif

QUOTE
Jeez, I'm feeling overprotected.

I think the X-Frame-Options HTTP header (that google.com used in my test) is a good feature, since it prevents things like clickjacking. You can always open a blocked framed page in its own window...
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
pandy
post Apr 21 2023, 06:06 AM
Post #13


🌟Computer says no🌟
********

Group: WDG Moderators
Posts: 20,733
Joined: 9-August 06
Member No.: 6



Are you saying FF showed that error because if the google's X-Frame-Options header? Why would they want to block a site for that? Or are you talking about two different things?

QUOTE(Christian J @ Apr 21 2023, 02:08 AM) *

I may have blacklisted my own domain. happy.gif


😁

User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
Christian J
post Apr 21 2023, 07:08 AM
Post #14


.
********

Group: WDG Moderators
Posts: 9,661
Joined: 10-August 06
Member No.: 7



QUOTE(pandy @ Apr 21 2023, 01:06 PM) *

Are you saying FF showed that error because if the google's X-Frame-Options header?

The error I quoted, yes.

QUOTE
Why would they want to block a site for that?

They're only blocking sites from framing other sites, to prevent fraud.
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
pandy
post Apr 21 2023, 11:43 PM
Post #15


🌟Computer says no🌟
********

Group: WDG Moderators
Posts: 20,733
Joined: 9-August 06
Member No.: 6



So Google's header wasn't part of this? unsure.gif
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
Christian J
post Apr 22 2023, 09:46 AM
Post #16


.
********

Group: WDG Moderators
Posts: 9,661
Joined: 10-August 06
Member No.: 7



Not in your case, AFAIK.
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th April 2024 - 08:34 AM