QUOTE(turillian @ Apr 9 2009, 10:15 PM)

I'll definitely look into using a non fixed width design some time soon. Right now I think I need to get a little more reading under my belt before I dive into that. I'm still working on understanding the different ways of laying a site out.
I wouldn't worry about it. Keep it simple. But not being fixed width actually means doing less not more -- the obvious problem is the header graphic, which can't be stretched to an arbitrary window width. But one solution is to left align the image and make it fade to a background green at the right, and perhaps make it a lot wider (like 1500 pixels, but I think you could compress it more without losing too much quality). Then if the window is wider than the graphic it doesn't look odd.
QUOTE
I have a question. How do you deal with maintaining the site? Right now what I do is use the built in solution that my web-host has. Which basically means that I'm tinkering with the files in a browser window, hitting save. And observing the effect on my website "live". So anyone's who's browsing my site gets to enjoy all the little things I break when I'm trying to fix things. All my links are absolute (or, they should be, I did a rough once-over). How do you deal with this?
Um. Gulp. Actually I do quite lot of edits live, so very occasionally I screw up, and the shop goes missing for up to, um, two minutes? But:
(a) You must keep a backup copy of the whole website totally removed from whoever your provider is. Of course they are not likely to lose it, but just suppose they did, you can be quite sure the conditions you agreed to say that you get no compensation for the loss.
(b) Ideally you keep a working copy on your local computer. (Are you using server side scripting? If so this means installing a web server etc at home.)
© The QD method I use is to save a test version as webpagex.htm (inserting an x), check it works, then copy to webpage.htm.
[Edit: Huh, more lunacy from Abysmal Software. Of course I mean (*c*) ...]
No reason to use absolute link addresses (you mean they quote 'http://...'?)
QUOTE
I understand that ads are generally unwanted, but I want to experiment with them a little bit just to get a feel for how they work. I know a company website is probably not the best place, but that's alright, I'll sacrifice a customer here and there for some learning.
EDIT: I've tried to keep the ads as unobtrusive in appearance as possible. I did, however, intentionally put the ad right below the navigation links.
If you have a noncommercial site - say a chess club - ads make sense, because your members will be happy to use your clicks to buy relevant stuff. But for a commercial site, either the links are just advertising the competition, or they are irrelevant, and thus junk. So I don't understand your argument here -- whatever you need to learn about using ads, surely you've now learnt it, and can get rid of them...?