The Web Design Group

... Making the Web accessible to all.

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Last Modified Date
denmarks
post Aug 24 2012, 10:27 AM
Post #1


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 207
Joined: 17-January 08
Member No.: 4,734



I am using document.lastModified to display the last modified date on a web page. The times are different in IE and Firefox. Why would that be?

IE shows 08/24/2012 08:20:45
Firefox shows 08/24/2012 08:21:48
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
pandy
post Aug 24 2012, 12:19 PM
Post #2


🌟Computer says no🌟
********

Group: WDG Moderators
Posts: 20,730
Joined: 9-August 06
Member No.: 6



Hmm... it took you one minute and three seconds to start FF and load the page in it? happy.gif

How do those times compare to your computer clock if you reload the page?
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
denmarks
post Aug 24 2012, 12:53 PM
Post #3


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 207
Joined: 17-January 08
Member No.: 4,734



QUOTE(pandy @ Aug 24 2012, 10:19 AM) *

Hmm... it took you one minute and three seconds to start FF and load the page in it? happy.gif

How do those times compare to your computer clock if you reload the page?


I just reloaded the page and the exact same times appear. Even if taken from the cache it is strange since I displayed it in Firefox FIRST.
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
pandy
post Aug 24 2012, 01:00 PM
Post #4


🌟Computer says no🌟
********

Group: WDG Moderators
Posts: 20,730
Joined: 9-August 06
Member No.: 6



Sorry, I'm so confused today. Of course you get the same. I read what you wrote but i was thinking current time, not last modified. blush.gif

That's strange. This page is on a server, I suppose?
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
denmarks
post Aug 24 2012, 01:06 PM
Post #5


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 207
Joined: 17-January 08
Member No.: 4,734



QUOTE(pandy @ Aug 24 2012, 11:00 AM) *

Sorry, I'm so confused today. Of course you get the same. I read what you wrote but i was thinking current time, not last modified. blush.gif

That's strange. This page is on a server, I suppose?


Yes
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
pandy
post Aug 24 2012, 03:36 PM
Post #6


🌟Computer says no🌟
********

Group: WDG Moderators
Posts: 20,730
Joined: 9-August 06
Member No.: 6



I tried to google but found nothing.
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
denmarks
post Aug 24 2012, 03:55 PM
Post #7


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 207
Joined: 17-January 08
Member No.: 4,734



QUOTE(pandy @ Aug 24 2012, 01:36 PM) *

I tried to google but found nothing.


The website is http://dmmarks.com/hawaii2012.html
The date displays at the bottom of the "please read" section.

IE - Last modified: 08/24/2012 11:43:53
Firefox - Last modified: 08/24/2012 11:46:19

First it was a 1 min and 3 sec difference.
I did another update and now it is 2 min and 26 sec.
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
pandy
post Aug 24 2012, 04:13 PM
Post #8


🌟Computer says no🌟
********

Group: WDG Moderators
Posts: 20,730
Joined: 9-August 06
Member No.: 6



It must be some odd caching issue even if I don't understand how this happens. I visited that page with 4 different browsers and I got the same time stamp with all of them.

CODE
K-mel:   Last modified: 08/24/2012 20:46:19
IE7:     Last modified: 08/24/2012 20:46:19
Iron:    Last modified: 08/24/2012 18:46:19
Opera:   Last modified: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 18:46:19 GMT
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
pandy
post Aug 24 2012, 04:14 PM
Post #9


🌟Computer says no🌟
********

Group: WDG Moderators
Posts: 20,730
Joined: 9-August 06
Member No.: 6



No I didn't! There's a 2 hour difference! I didn't even look at the hour first, just minutes and seconds. wacko.gif
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
Christian J
post Aug 25 2012, 03:45 PM
Post #10


.
********

Group: WDG Moderators
Posts: 9,656
Joined: 10-August 06
Member No.: 7



Seems there are quirks in (at least older) browsers:

"Finally, Opera and Explorer 4 give a date two hours too early, while Explorer 3 even makes it 17 hours early. The Explorer 4 error seems to be that it doesn't take time zones and daylight saving time into account. My server returns a GMT time and Explorer 4 literally copies it, while Netscape and Explorer 5 calculate local time."
http://www.jr.pl/www.quirksmode.org/js/lastmod.html

The above doesn't explain that one minute and three second difference. Are you sure you didn't change the page in between?

Server-side scripts should be more reliable, e.g. PHP's getlastmod() function.
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
pandy
post Aug 25 2012, 04:29 PM
Post #11


🌟Computer says no🌟
********

Group: WDG Moderators
Posts: 20,730
Joined: 9-August 06
Member No.: 6



Ah, of course ppk would have something on it. Good find. Or did you have it bookmarked?

The two hour difference I get made me think about offset from GMT + daylight saving, but I didn't really think it could be that dumb.
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
pandy
post Aug 25 2012, 04:32 PM
Post #12


🌟Computer says no🌟
********

Group: WDG Moderators
Posts: 20,730
Joined: 9-August 06
Member No.: 6



QUOTE(Christian J @ Aug 25 2012, 10:45 PM) *

Server-side scripts should be more reliable, e.g. PHP's getlastmod() function.


I think last modified should be hardcoded to be of any use. People would want to know when content was added or changed, right? No one cares if and when the author corrected a typo or a HTML mistake.
But that's me.
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
denmarks
post Aug 25 2012, 04:38 PM
Post #13


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 207
Joined: 17-January 08
Member No.: 4,734



Here is the latest
Firefox - Last modified: 08/25/2012 11:51:49
IE - Last modified: 08/25/2012 11:51:26

Now it is 23 seconds.
http://hawaii.dmmarks.com

If really doesn't matter that much. It is just to let people about when the last change was. I tried doing it manually but kept forgetting.

This post has been edited by denmarks: Aug 25 2012, 04:40 PM
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
pandy
post Aug 25 2012, 06:30 PM
Post #14


🌟Computer says no🌟
********

Group: WDG Moderators
Posts: 20,730
Joined: 9-August 06
Member No.: 6



You should write to ppk. Maybe he's still interested.

Nice new ava BTW. IMO a handsome hat is essenctal in avatars. happy.gif
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
Christian J
post Aug 26 2012, 07:59 AM
Post #15


.
********

Group: WDG Moderators
Posts: 9,656
Joined: 10-August 06
Member No.: 7



QUOTE(pandy @ Aug 25 2012, 11:29 PM) *

Ah, of course ppk would have something on it. Good find. Or did you have it bookmarked?

Just googled.

QUOTE
The two hour difference I get made me think about offset from GMT + daylight saving, but I didn't really think it could be that dumb.

I couldn't find anything about web standards (haven't checked the ECMA script spec, though). Maybe there isn't any.

QUOTE
I think last modified should be hardcoded to be of any use. People would want to know when content was added or changed, right? No one cares if and when the author corrected a typo or a HTML mistake.
But that's me.

I like to post a news item on the site's news page about important changes (and/or add to the page's revision history). OTOH a lazy author will always forget to manually change the date of the edited page, or maybe the reader and author disagrees on what's considered a real change? Sometimes even a corrected typo could be important. unsure.gif

QUOTE
You should write to ppk. Maybe he's still interested.

FWIW he seems to have removed the page (along with a lot of other content) from his current site. Seems he's mostly into mobile phones these days.

QUOTE
IMO a handsome hat is essenctal in avatars.

Just noticed I have one myself. cool.gif

User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
Christian J
post Aug 26 2012, 08:16 AM
Post #16


.
********

Group: WDG Moderators
Posts: 9,656
Joined: 10-August 06
Member No.: 7



QUOTE(denmarks @ Aug 25 2012, 11:38 PM) *

Here is the latest
Firefox - Last modified: 08/25/2012 11:51:49
IE - Last modified: 08/25/2012 11:51:26

Now it is 23 seconds.
http://hawaii.dmmarks.com

According to http://www.rexswain.com/cgi-bin/httpview.cgi the current Last modified date is 25·Aug·2012·22:44:14·GMT.

BTW your URL above redirects to http://dmmarks.com/hawaii2012.html --I assume the browser uses the Last Modified header for the latter. Could that have something to do about this (like if the server sometimes incorrectly sends the header for the former URL)? unsure.gif

BTW2, I get a JS error for line 1104 in IE9. You should probably use a comma instead of a period sign here:

CODE
onclick="printEvent('K'.'Book Club');"



User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
Christian J
post Aug 26 2012, 08:20 AM
Post #17


.
********

Group: WDG Moderators
Posts: 9,656
Joined: 10-August 06
Member No.: 7



Another long shot. Bookmarklets that show the Last Modified date often refuse to work if the page uses frames. Don't know why, but maybe the same reason applies to your script too? Your page does use iframes...
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
denmarks
post Aug 26 2012, 09:23 AM
Post #18


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 207
Joined: 17-January 08
Member No.: 4,734



QUOTE(Christian J @ Aug 26 2012, 06:16 AM) *

BTW2, I get a JS error for line 1104 in IE9. You should probably use a comma instead of a period sign here:
CODE
onclick="printEvent('K'.'Book Club');"


Thanks for catching the error.
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
pandy
post Aug 26 2012, 10:09 AM
Post #19


🌟Computer says no🌟
********

Group: WDG Moderators
Posts: 20,730
Joined: 9-August 06
Member No.: 6



QUOTE(Christian J @ Aug 26 2012, 02:59 PM) *

QUOTE
IMO a handsome hat is essenctal in avatars.

Just noticed I have one myself. cool.gif


That's a hat? Always thought it was goggles. A bandana maybe?
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd April 2024 - 03:23 PM