The Web Design Group

... Making the Web accessible to all.

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> pagespeed concern
pandy
post Feb 5 2016, 10:59 AM
Post #21


🌟Computer says no🌟
********

Group: WDG Moderators
Posts: 20,732
Joined: 9-August 06
Member No.: 6



You made me try the almighty google tool. I ran it on a page with nothing but two links. The HTML is all in all 398 bytes (not Kb, bytes!). Oh yes, there is an external style sheet. 4 rules, 231 bytes.

This is what Google tells me, among other things.

CODE
Use legible font sizes


Huh? The font size is set to 100%. unsure.gif

CODE
Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content


Yeah, sure. 232 bytes didn't block any rendering when I was on 28.8. biggrin.gif


Here is what they approved of.

CODE
Avoid landing page redirects
Your page has no redirects. Learn more about avoiding landing page redirects.

Enable compression
You have compression enabled. Learn more about enabling compression.

Minify CSS
Your CSS is minified. Learn more about minifying CSS.

Minify HTML
Your HTML is minified. Learn more about minifying HTML.

Minify JavaScript
Your JavaScript content is minified. Learn more about minifying JavaScript.

Optimize images
Your images are optimized. Learn more about optimizing images.

Prioritize visible content
You have the above-the-fold content properly prioritized. Learn more about prioritizing visible content.



Everything sure is minified and no doubt the two links are above the fold. Don't know how they detected I had optimized my images though, because there are no images at all.

See? They feed the same to everyone. I hereby declare this tool stoopid. Nuff said. cool.gif ninja.gif
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
Christian J
post Feb 5 2016, 02:24 PM
Post #22


.
********

Group: WDG Moderators
Posts: 9,661
Joined: 10-August 06
Member No.: 7



QUOTE(pandy @ Feb 5 2016, 04:59 PM) *

See? They feed the same to everyone. I hereby declare this tool stoopid. Nuff said. cool.gif ninja.gif

Thanks for your scientific experiment. laugh.gif

I tested the OP's site. It got 90/100 for mobile and 97/100 for desktop, which seems like a very good score even according to Google itself.
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
pandy
post Feb 6 2016, 12:15 AM
Post #23


🌟Computer says no🌟
********

Group: WDG Moderators
Posts: 20,732
Joined: 9-August 06
Member No.: 6



My page got 93/100 for desktop and 57/100 for mobile. Ridiculous. I can assure you it's very mobile friendly. biggrin.gif
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
pandy
post Feb 6 2016, 12:16 AM
Post #24


🌟Computer says no🌟
********

Group: WDG Moderators
Posts: 20,732
Joined: 9-August 06
Member No.: 6



Wonder what one has to do to get 100/100. Not have any content at all? blink.gif
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
pandy
post Feb 6 2016, 12:22 AM
Post #25


🌟Computer says no🌟
********

Group: WDG Moderators
Posts: 20,732
Joined: 9-August 06
Member No.: 6



Bingo! 100/100 for desktop!

CODE

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">

<html>

<head>
<title>Foo</title>
</head>


<body>

<h1>Bar</h1>

<p>
Hello World.</p>

</body>
</html>


But only 84/100 for mobile! laugh.gif

User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
Christian J
post Feb 6 2016, 06:21 AM
Post #26


.
********

Group: WDG Moderators
Posts: 9,661
Joined: 10-August 06
Member No.: 7



Maybe the unstyled H1 is considered too big. unsure.gif
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post
JimiB
post Feb 8 2016, 05:02 PM
Post #27


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 49
Joined: 23-January 15
Member No.: 22,076



QUOTE(Christian J @ Feb 5 2016, 11:18 AM) *

QUOTE(JimiB @ Feb 3 2016, 11:56 AM) *

How high PageSpeed score did your page get? Apparently 85-100 is OK according to Google: https://developers.google.com/speed/docs/insights/about

I managed to get it up to 98/100 now its 97 and loads in 0.4 seconds which i am happy with but just became concerned by the render blocking by style.css message.

Jimi
User is offlinePM
Go to the top of the page
Toggle Multi-post QuotingQuote Post

2 Pages V < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th April 2024 - 11:55 PM