pagespeed concern |
pagespeed concern |
pandy |
Feb 5 2016, 10:59 AM
Post
#21
|
🌟Computer says no🌟 Group: WDG Moderators Posts: 20,732 Joined: 9-August 06 Member No.: 6 |
You made me try the almighty google tool. I ran it on a page with nothing but two links. The HTML is all in all 398 bytes (not Kb, bytes!). Oh yes, there is an external style sheet. 4 rules, 231 bytes.
This is what Google tells me, among other things. CODE Use legible font sizes Huh? The font size is set to 100%. CODE Eliminate render-blocking JavaScript and CSS in above-the-fold content Yeah, sure. 232 bytes didn't block any rendering when I was on 28.8. Here is what they approved of. CODE Avoid landing page redirects Your page has no redirects. Learn more about avoiding landing page redirects. Enable compression You have compression enabled. Learn more about enabling compression. Minify CSS Your CSS is minified. Learn more about minifying CSS. Minify HTML Your HTML is minified. Learn more about minifying HTML. Minify JavaScript Your JavaScript content is minified. Learn more about minifying JavaScript. Optimize images Your images are optimized. Learn more about optimizing images. Prioritize visible content You have the above-the-fold content properly prioritized. Learn more about prioritizing visible content. Everything sure is minified and no doubt the two links are above the fold. Don't know how they detected I had optimized my images though, because there are no images at all. See? They feed the same to everyone. I hereby declare this tool stoopid. Nuff said. |
Christian J |
Feb 5 2016, 02:24 PM
Post
#22
|
. Group: WDG Moderators Posts: 9,661 Joined: 10-August 06 Member No.: 7 |
|
pandy |
Feb 6 2016, 12:15 AM
Post
#23
|
🌟Computer says no🌟 Group: WDG Moderators Posts: 20,732 Joined: 9-August 06 Member No.: 6 |
My page got 93/100 for desktop and 57/100 for mobile. Ridiculous. I can assure you it's very mobile friendly.
|
pandy |
Feb 6 2016, 12:16 AM
Post
#24
|
🌟Computer says no🌟 Group: WDG Moderators Posts: 20,732 Joined: 9-August 06 Member No.: 6 |
Wonder what one has to do to get 100/100. Not have any content at all?
|
pandy |
Feb 6 2016, 12:22 AM
Post
#25
|
🌟Computer says no🌟 Group: WDG Moderators Posts: 20,732 Joined: 9-August 06 Member No.: 6 |
Bingo! 100/100 for desktop!
CODE <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd"> <html> <head> <title>Foo</title> </head> <body> <h1>Bar</h1> <p> Hello World.</p> </body> </html> But only 84/100 for mobile! |
Christian J |
Feb 6 2016, 06:21 AM
Post
#26
|
. Group: WDG Moderators Posts: 9,661 Joined: 10-August 06 Member No.: 7 |
Maybe the unstyled H1 is considered too big.
|
JimiB |
Feb 8 2016, 05:02 PM
Post
#27
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 49 Joined: 23-January 15 Member No.: 22,076 |
How high PageSpeed score did your page get? Apparently 85-100 is OK according to Google: https://developers.google.com/speed/docs/insights/about I managed to get it up to 98/100 now its 97 and loads in 0.4 seconds which i am happy with but just became concerned by the render blocking by style.css message. Jimi |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th April 2024 - 11:55 PM |